Would electing Romney or McCain guarantee more Katrina (neglect/false imprisonment/martial law) atrocities?

I didn't know this, but Romney and McCain (along with Giuliani and Thompson) refused to attend the PBS All-American Debate that addressed African American issues. Huckabee, who participated, said that he was ashamed for the Republican party.Would electing Romney or McCain guarantee more Katrina (neglect/false imprisonment/martial law) atrocities?
Shhhh!!!!


You're not supposed to be able to figure that out


Go watch more TV and be a good ameriKKKanWould electing Romney or McCain guarantee more Katrina (neglect/false imprisonment/martial law) atrocities?
Katrina was a state problem - not a national problem.





sadly, the citizens of New Orleans saw this coming and ignored it - thats not Bush's fault. They had a week to get out and they knew the levees were a problem.





I blame the mayor of New Orleans for everything that went on down there.





As for a generic stance on Martial law - sometimes its necessary for the law to take control, hopefully they remember who they work for and the laws they've sworn to uphold.





I think katrina will make a deeper impact for the rest of us not to take mother nature for granted and under estimate her power and heed warnings.





Im sure Romney %26amp; McCain would be fine
It was more likely scheduling conflicts.


Their schedules are set months in advance right down to the hour.
Thats why Huckabee will never be a viable candidate
Romney didn't refuse to attend the forum. He received the invitation too late to change his commitments; and since the other major candidates had dropped out, he didn't have much incentive to break those commitments. The only reason Huckabee was free is because he was so unpopular (back then) that he jumped at opportunities to show up, just so he could get his face on some free television. I doubt he cared that much more than anyone else.





As for a President Romney ensuring more ';Katrina atrocities';, that's simply not the case. Mitt Romney may be rich, but that doesn't make him insensitive. He was a missionary for two and half years, living with and helping out people much poorer than you or I.





He's also a very moral man, a family man, and he'd never let a disaster like Katrina go unnoticed. As both a Bishop and a Stake President in his church, he handled a lot of welfare cases for people both in and out of the LDS church. He's familiar with other people's sufferings, and he is sensitive to them.





Learn more about Mitt Romney the man.
Just like a liberal. Taking a nasty incoherent swipe at someone based on non- factual statements.
With McCain probably Thompson didn't refuse I don't know about Romney where you getting your facts?








VOTE ROMNEY!!!
i think lalusanana already took care of one of the problems,they elected bobby jindel,a republican.now they need to get rid of ray nagin.the failure of katrina was the front lines i.e. city,state!!!!!!!!!